← BACK TO FEED
semiconductor tariffsTrumpAI policydata centreschip supply chain

Chip Tariffs Could Be the Most Self-Defeating Thing Trump Does to AI

The Trump administration is considering sweeping semiconductor tariffs that could extend beyond chips to include downstream products like servers, gaming consoles, and consumer devices, alarming the tech industry at a critical moment in AI infrastructure development. Industry groups warn the tariffs could cost the US $90 billion annually in GDP, delay or cancel roughly 20% of planned data centre projects, and ultimately undermine the very AI dominance Trump claims to be pursuing — since domestic chip manufacturing capacity won't be ready in time to replace imports. Despite intensive lobbying efforts, talks between the tech industry and Trump officials have reportedly trended in a negative direction, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick pushing for broad tariff application tied to companies pledging domestic production commitments.

The Trump administration is reportedly weeks or months away from announcing a sweeping new round of semiconductor tariffs, and the tech industry is not being subtle about how it feels. One senior figure from a major industry group, someone who actually served in Trump's first term, called it "the single dumbest way imaginable to pursue American dominance in AI." The metaphor they chose: kneecapping yourself at the starting line.

That's not hyperbole. It's arithmetic.

According to Politico, which spoke to around eight sources with knowledge of the administration's plans, one approach under serious consideration would hit not just chips but the full downstream product stack. Servers, gaming consoles, data centre equipment. Possibly even used or refurbished goods that happen to contain semiconductors. The framework is apparently still being finalised, but if it lands anywhere near that broad, the industry believes it could be catastrophic.

The Computer and Communications Industry Association has done the sums. Broad tariffs of this kind would cost around $90 billion annually in GDP and cause roughly one in five data centre projects planned through 2030 to be delayed or scrapped outright. Worse, some of that investment wouldn't stay in the US waiting for domestic chip plants to come online. It would leave. Which rather undermines the entire point.

There's a basic tension at the heart of this that nobody in the administration seems keen to acknowledge publicly. US chip fabrication capacity doesn't exist at the scale needed, and building it takes years. Companies can't buy chips domestically that aren't being made domestically yet. Taxing the imports they're currently dependent on doesn't conjure new fabs into existence. It just makes the AI infrastructure buildout more expensive at exactly the moment the administration claims to want that infrastructure built. As one analysis put it: there is no version of the timeline where domestic supply arrives before the buildout needs the chips.

The tech industry has been running a lobbying campaign to at minimum secure exemptions for data centres. So far, those talks have reportedly "trended in a negative direction."

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick appears to be the main obstacle. He reportedly favours a quota-based system where a set volume of chips could enter duty-free, with that allowance tied to how much a company commits to producing on US soil. Individual countries could face different tariff rates on top of that, creating a maze of variables for firms trying to plan supply chains years in advance.

The problem, as one industry representative pointed out, is that the duty-free volume being discussed wouldn't even cover the hyperscalers alone, never mind the broader industry. "The math literally just does not work," they said.

For consumers, the ripple effects would be considerable. Smartphones, laptops, tablets, connected vehicles, all of it gets more expensive. New product launches, including those featuring recent AI capabilities, could be delayed. The CCIA's letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, co-signed by roughly 20 trade groups, made the point bluntly: consumer devices are how most Americans access AI tools. Price people out of buying those devices and you slow AI adoption. Which is, again, the opposite of what the administration says it wants.

The administration may impose tariffs in phases rather than all at once, partly to soften the impact and possibly with an eye on the holiday season. Trump has previously pulled back from tariffs to avoid consumer price backlash hitting his approval ratings, so there's precedent for political pragmatism winning out.

Some relief for AI firms is apparently being considered, but Politico's sources say it would likely be conditional on foreign companies investing in domestic chip manufacturing. That's not nothing, but it's a narrow carve-out relative to the scale of what's being proposed.

Earlier this year, the administration's semiconductor tariffs pointedly excluded data centres. In May, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer was saying publicly that timing and calibration mattered, and that companies actively reshoring production shouldn't face immediate duties. What changed is unclear, though a Commerce Department report submitted on 1 July, which remains unpublished, may hold the answer. That report was tasked with determining whether the data centre exemption should continue, and it appears to be at the centre of current negotiations.

The industry's asks are relatively pragmatic. Keep the tariff rate at 10 percent rather than 25. Exempt semiconductors used in AI servers. Don't double-tax firms by charging duties on both the chips and the products that contain them. Set a de minimis threshold so that products where chips are incidental aren't dragged in. And acknowledge that secondhand goods resellers can't always trace the provenance of the components inside what they're selling.

The broader ask, obviously, is to not do this at all. Investment in US chipmaking is currently at a historic high. The CCIA's position is that if the government wants to accelerate domestic capacity, the tools are permitting reform, infrastructure investment, and supply chain support. Not tariffs that raise the cost of everything the buildout requires.

Whether that argument lands depends largely on Lutnick, who seems unconvinced. The coming weeks will determine whether the administration blinks or whether the AI industry faces a self-imposed headwind at precisely the wrong moment.

READ NEXT
Australia Tells AI Companies to Generate More Power Than They Use and Pay for Content They Train OnThree Phone Calls and America's AI Safety Order Was DeadLawsuit Claims Trump's Truth Social API Is Selling Government Information to the Highest Bidder